Normalisation methods The normalisation process aims at balancing many of the systematic variations present in an array experiment (Quackenbush, 2002).
In addition to these methods, there are a number of alternative approaches including:
However, none of these approaches takes into account systematic biases that may appear in the data. Several reports have indicated that the log2(ratio) values can have a systematic dependence on intensity. Lowess normalisation is a locally linear robust scatter plot smoother generally preferred to an overall linear correction because it compensates for variation of the correction factor with signal intensity and is largely unaffected by outliers, including the regulated transcripts. Normalisation references
Genes whose expression is expected to be constant across samples adopted as internal controls. However, recent studies have demonstrated that genes that do not change in their expression levels in response to a variety of experimental conditions simply do not exist. Another approach to control variability in microarray experiments is to spot genomic DNA in multiple dilutions on the array and use the signal obtained after hybridisation for normalisation purposes (Benes and Muckenthaler, 2003).
External controls can be used as negative controls if no corresponding mRNA is present in the RNA samples to be analysed; negative controls help to determine the noise of a microarray experiment. In some cases
Positive or “spike-in” controls: exogenous RNAs added to the reference and the experimental samples in predetermined concentrations before the synthesis of fluorescent-labelled cDNAs. Spike-in controls need to titrated to cover the entire range of signal intensities obtained in a microarray experiment to be representative for all detectable genes. Spike-in RNAs added in equal amounts to the reference and experimental sample can serve as normalisation controls (Benes and Muckenthaler, 2003). | . |